Yes, Urine therapy is very scientific and it has scientific base. Justification is very simple for those people who can understand the basic theory of immunie system of the body. In short ,you can understand by one example like vaccination ,of new born child and for small-pox prevention .Very small dose of diease is vaccinated in the human body to boost the immunie system.If you want to know in detail Please contact me through my mail
‘ sanjgarg @ gmail.com”
References :
My own Experience

only if you drink it in public so others can find out what a big dope you are peace out. brother
References :

I had flu all the time. Antibiotics didn’t help anymore. One day I got a very strong flu and decided to try urine therapy. To my surprise the flu became weak and I felt much better. I drink a glass of urine every day. Flu no more, hair getting darker and skin better too. Thanks to urine therapy I do not use antibiotics anymore and I feel stronger.

i had food poisoning one time for about 2 weeks. the second week it was soo bad that i wasnt able to walk comfortably. lets just say that ive been in bed all week. i kept having to go number 3 sometimes even in my pants. after the second week i have decided that id try half a cup of urine. the next morning i was able to shit solid again. i really dont know if the therapy acually worked or my immune sytem actually fought it off after 2 weeks of battle. all im saying is that it wasnt getting any better for me at the moment and as soon as i tried the therapy the next morning i was feeling better.

Sources other than your own, please? I really can’t find any legitimate studies or scientific proof on-line, and I’d really love to see some.

Where are other sources of scientific proof online? I’ve found specific studies while looking for certain things, however, I’ve been flabbergasted by the “weak science” in many studies I have found. The Martha Christy book has abstracts of many scientific studies directly related to UT. She also has a book about UT and scientific studies. I don’t have that particular book. However, if you want to start creating a list of what’s available online, that would really be great. To dig deeper may require purchasing some books and contacting some research institutions and asking them if they’d be willing to email you a PDF file. Please, if you get to that point, ask if we can link to or publish the study here.

A search of “urine therapy” via pubmed clinical trials yields ‘0′ results. What research do you refer to then when you say UT “is very scientific”? I’m not making fun of urine drinkers at all, if anything I feel let down that there hasn’t been even one double blinded well designed clinical trial to determine the healing merit of UT. A suggestion, determine what condition UT is rumored to be the best treatment for, get a random group of random people with that specific health condition that are also unaware they are going to be drinking their own urine, and see if urine cures the ailment. Until that happens UT has NO scientific basis. I’m sorry but these are the cold facts.

Hi Mr. Skeptic: Please let me know how you are going to get a group of people to drink their own urine without knowing that they are doing it? Now, if we start looking at urea, or other urine derivatives or synthetic urine duplicates, we start making some progress. Take carbamide peroxide, for example, look up what it is and what it does. Double-blind studies are not the only way to discover scientific truths. One cannot prove the benefits of massage, because one cannot “fake” a massage. One could compare specific types of massage, but you can’t have a person receive a massage and have them unaware that they are receiving a massage. Physical therapy is unproven, as is exercise. You can’t “double blind” the effectiveness of exercise. It’s ludicrous, and it’s ludicrous to think that the double blind study is the only way to walk the path of valid science. Double blind, in a sense, is like a needle. We can use double blind studies to isolate very specific scientific truths. What does medication XYZ do? What happens if we leave out Y and it’s now medication XZ? Martha Christy’s book has abstracts of many scientific studies that are let’s say, directly related to the effectiveness of UT. No one is going to just hand you this info on a platter.

Now, if you can help us design REAL process to prove or disprove the efficacy of UT in any given situation, then rock and roll…let us know.

What if 100 people with various ailments, let’s just call them “sick,” were to start practicing UT and umm…how about…do nothing else…but then there are already uncontrolled variables, some will be vegetarian, others smoke, others exercise, I mean, where are you going to find a pool of candidates that “are the same?”

So, here’s my proposal: 100 people who call themselves sick voluntarily begin UT. We measure everything we can measure. If they seek complimentary treatments, there’s nothing we can do but track that. We aren’t about to restrict people from seeking and applying the treatments they feel will help them.

Another 100 people also call themselves “sick.” Basically, we would have to track their conditions and maybe track the severity of the conditions overall. So, we’d have a gradation of 1-10 where 10 is sick and dying and 1 is not really sick. Maybe it would be 1-100. Anyway, we track both measurable and subjective variables.

At any rate, we have another 100 people who are just asked to have their medical parameters tracked. That’s it. They are sick. How about, they go to the doctor. That’s it. Either they do or don’t do what their doctor tells them, and they track what they’ve done and haven’t done and they track whether they are more or less well after, let’s say 1 year.

People report weekly and fill out a survey. These surveys are attached to blood tests, severity measures of their conditions, and whatever other medical parameters that are worthwhile to gather.

Essentially, then we have 100 non-UT people who’ve visited their doctors. We track what they’ve done and haven’t done, and we track their well being at the end of one year.
We also have 100 people who have voluntarily begun UT, and we track them the same way.

Would that be scientific?

Help us design an experiment that would satisfy your need for scientific accuracy, and definitely check out the research already done. When you read Martha Christy’s book, she has another book she sells specifically on the scientific basis of urine therapy.

I gave my copy of Marthy Christy’s book away, and I need to order another copy. In the back is a phone number, and I’d like to order her “scientific justification of UT” book, but that one seems to only be available through her.

So step 1 is to gather existing documentation (studies etc.) Step 2 would be to design a viable micro-funded scientific experiment with the help of sharp minds such as yours.